The federal government on Thursday challenged PTI founder Imran Khan and former foreign minister Shah Mahmo
od Qureshi’s acquittals in the cipher case before the Supreme Court.
The verdict was challenged in a petition through the interior secretary t
hat prayed for the leave to appeal to be granted and for the plea to be turned into an appeal in the “best interest of justice”.
The petition argued
that the IHC order was “perverse, arbitrary and contrary to the material available on the record” and thus liable to be set aside.
It argued
that the Official Secrets Act (OSA), 1923 did not provide the provision of filing an appeal against the judgment of the special court judge and
that the IHC did not “appreciate” that it lacked the jurisdiction or power to create rights which were not provided by the Constitution or a validly enacted law.
The petition said
that the act did not say
that the provisions of the Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1958, would be applicable for filing an appeal.
“It is an established principle of law that where the legislature has not provided something in the language of the law, the court cannot travel beyond its jurisdiction and read something to the law as the same would be ultra vires the powers available to the court under the constitution and would constitute an order without jurisdiction,” it argued. It further said
that the special law would have an overriding effect on the general law and thus the criminal proced
ure code was not applicable in the case of those tried for offences under the OSA.
“The conduct of the respondents was non-cooperative throughout the trial and they made very possible efforts to delay the proceedings. The record of the trial court is evidence of the fact that 65 miscellaneous applications were moved by the respondents were heard and decided by the trial court.
“The matter was number of times adjourned on the request of the respondents or their counsels. The witnesses r
emained present in the court but their cross-examination was not carried out by the defence counsels. The learned trial court appointed the defence counsels on the expense of the state, who had completed the trial. The respondents tried to defeat the cause of justice by indefinite procrastination,” the petition said, adding
that these aspects were not considered by the IHC.
The plea reasoned that it was a “settled principle of law” that if a court came to the conclusion that a trial was not carried out fairly then the “only way out provided under the law is to remand the matter to the trial court for giving proper opportunity”.
It said the prosecution had produced “overwhelming evidence” in support of its case and the admission by the accused was “sufficient to establish the case beyond any shadow of doubt”.
Separately, a local court in the federal capital on Thursday acquitted the top party leaders including founder Imran Khan and Shah Mahmo
od Qureshi in vandalism and rioting case related to ‘Azadi March’ in 2022.
Besides the top PTI leaders, the court exonerated Awami Muslim League (AML) chief Sheikh Rashid Ahmed in the same case as it announced a reserved verdict on their acquittal pleas.
Judicial Magistrate Malik Muhammad Imran pronounced the verdict in the case lodged at I-9 police station of the federal capital related to the protest march launched by the opposition party in 2022, under the charges of vandalism and violation of Section 144.
The district and sessions court also acquitted former PTI leaders Sadaqat Abbasi and Ali Nawaz Awan too in the case.
.jpg)
.jpg)
